Visits:

Xi Luo

Ph.D. Supervisor and Master's Supervisor

Share:
  • Name:  Xi Luo

  • Professional Title:  Associate Professor

  • Administrative Position:  研究生教学管理中心(建筑学科)主任

  • Name (Pinyin):  luoxi

  • Sex:  Male

  • School/Department:  School of Architecture and Art

  • Education Level:  PhD Graduate

  • Date of Employment:  2007-07-01

  • Degree:  Doctoral degree

  • Alma Mater:  中南大学

  • Status:  Employed

  • Discipline:  Architecture

  • Enrollment Disciplines:  Architecture

  • Mobile

  • Email

Home

Current Location: Home > Journal Publications

Inclusive Innovation Spaces in Changsha: Spatial Distribution, Agglomeration Characteristics, and Driving Factors

Release time:2026-06-22
Hits:
DOI number:
10.3390/land15061102
Journal:
land
Key Words:
innovation space; inclusive urban innovation; spatial pattern; evaluation index system; sustainable urban development
Abstract:
Against the backdrop of China’s urban modernization pathway, the core value of urban in-novation systems is increasingly shifting toward an inclusive orientation. Grounded in the theoretical connotation of inclusive urban innovation, this study establishes an evaluation index system covering equal participation opportunities, procedural fairness, and outcome sharing, and applies the entropy method, kernel density analysis, and spatial autocorrela-tion to empirically examine the spatial distribution characteristics and formation mecha-nisms of inclusive innovation spaces in Changsha. The results show that (1) Changsha’s inclusive innovation level presents a gradient decline from the central urban area to the periphery; (2) high–high clusters mainly in areas with stronger innovation–resource con-centration and better public service conditions, such as Yuelu District and other districts associated with major innovation platforms. Low–low agglomeration zones cluster in peripheral urban areas like certain townships in Liuyang City and remote regions of Ningx-iang City; (3) the spatial differentiation of inclusive innovation is jointly shaped by multiple factors, among which Cultural Education and Industrial Structure show relatively stronger explanatory power; and (4) improving inclusive innovation requires enhancing not only innovation agglomeration, but also public service accessibility, talent support, employment inclusion, and the local sharing of innovation outcomes. This study provides a systematic framework for evaluating urban inclusive innovation space and offers policy insights for promoting balanced and inclusive innovation development in regional innovation cities.
Indexed by:
Journal paper
Translation or Not:
no
Date of Publication:
2026-06-22
Included Journals:
SSCI
Attachments: